Understanding the experience of deviant behaviors in the workplace: a phenomenological study among the employees of Isfahan Islamic Azad University (Khorasgan)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD in Management, Department of Management, Comprehensive University of Applied Sciences, Drizhno Cultural and Artistic Center, Farrokhshahr, Iran.

2 Bachelor's student, Preschool Teacher Training, Comprehensive University of Applied Sciences, Farsan Center, Farsan, Iran.

3 Bachelor's student, Management, Comprehensive University of Applied Sciences, Farsan Center, Farsan, Iran.

4 - Bachelor's student, Management, Comprehensive University of Applied Sciences, Farsan Center, Farsan, Iran.

5 Master's student, Employee, Comprehensive University of Applied Sciences, Provincial Branch of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, Iran.

Abstract

Investigating deviant behaviors in the workplace, which subject organizational norms to fluctuations and threaten the health of the organization and its employees, is an important issue; therefore, given the importance of discussing deviant behaviors in the workplace and its negative consequences, the present study was conducted with the aim of describing and identifying employees' experiences of deviant behaviors in the workplace. The research method was applied in terms of purpose and qualitative data collection using the phenomenological method, and the target population was the employees of the Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), and the required data were collected through in-depth interviews with 25 people selected using the maximum discrimination purposive sampling method. For the validity of the research, the Lincoln construct validity approaches and the external validity, descriptive validity, and interpretive validity were used. In order to examine the reliability of the results, the Rao and Perry triple approach was used. The modified Stotic-Collision method was used to analyze the data. The findings of the study showed that the antecedents of deviant behavior in the workplace included 8 main themes: individual antecedents, group antecedents, organizational antecedents, cultural antecedents, political antecedents, economic antecedents, social antecedents, and legal and regulatory antecedents, and the resulting consequences were categorized into 4 main themes: organizational consequences, individual consequences, cultural consequences, and group consequences. The presence of deviant behavior in the workplace may impose great costs on organizations; loss of organizational resources, reduced employee productivity, reduced organizational performance, disorder, injustice, tension, etc. are some of the undesirable consequences of deviant behavior.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Aksu  ali(2016). Organizational deviance and multi-factor leadership. Journal  Educational Research and Reviews. Vol. 11(8), pp. 589-597.
Appelbaum, H. Laconi. Matousek. (2007). "Positive and negative deviant workplace behaviors: Causes, impacts and solutions". Corporate governance international journal of business in society, 7(5)586-598.
Ariani, D. W. (2013). The relationship between employee engagement, organizational citizenship behavior, and counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Business Administration, 4(2), 46-56.
Biswas, M., & Rahman, S. (2023). Emotional Intelligence and Counterproductive Work Behavior -An Empirical Investigation for Asia. The Journal of Management Theory and Practice (JMTP), 4(1), 1-22.
Bozkus, k. (2023). Counterproductive Workplace Behavior (CWBs): Antecedents and Outcomes. Organizational Behavior, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1001827.
Bujang, M. A. bin, Kamaluddin, M. R., Mat Basir, S., Munusamy, S., & Jhee Jiow, H. (2024). Impacts of Workplace Culture on Deviant Workplace Behavior: A Systematic Review. Sage Open14(2).1-20.
Connor Peter J. O. Stone, Sharon. Walker, Benjamin R.  Jackson Chris J.)2017). Deviant behavior in constrained environments: Sensation-Seeking predicts workplace deviance in shallow learners. Personality and Individual Differences108.pp20-25.
Diefendorff, J. M., & Mehta, K. (2007). The relations of motivational traits with workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 924, 967–977.
De Clercq, D., Haq, I. U., & Azeem, M. U. (2019). Time- related work stress and counterproductive work behavior: Invigorating roles of deviant personality traits. Personnel Review, 48(7), 1756–1781.
Galperin Bella L., Burke Ronald J. (2006). "Uncovering the Relationship Between Workaholism and Workplace Destructive and Constructive Deviance: an Exploratory Study", International Journal of Human Resource Management. 17/2:331-347.
Gatling, Anthony .Cass Shum, Laura Book. Billy Bai(2017). The influence of hospitality leaders’ relational transparency on followers’ trust and deviance behaviors: Mediating role of behavioral integrity. International Journal of Hospitality Management 62 . 11–20
Hulin. C. L.) 2002( Lessons form Industrial and Organizational Psychology. In J. Brett and F. Drasgow Eds. The Psychology of Work: Theoretically Based Empirical Research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.pp. 3-22.
Jain, A. K. (2009). Exploring the relative relevance of organizational citizenship behavior and Emotional Intelligence. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 35(1), 87-97.
Jiang, H.Jiang, X.Sun, P. and Li, X. (2020), "Coping with workplace ostracism: the roles of emotional exhaustion and resilience in deviant behavior", Management Decision, Vol.58.pp1-30.
Kareem, R. F., Ojeleye, C. I., & Sodamade, I. O. (2023). Work Engagement as the Mediator of the Relationship between Workplace Civility and Workplace Deviant Behaviour among Employees of Tertiary Institutions in Zamfara State. Lapai Journal of Economics, 7(1), 70–87. 
Lanzo, L., Aziz, S., & Wuensch, K. (2016). Workaholism and incivility: stress and psychological capital’s role. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 9(2), 165-183.
Li, P., Yin, K., Shi, J., Damen, T. G. E., & Taris, T. W. (2023). Are Bad Leaders Indeed Bad for Employees? A Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies Between Destructive Leadership and Employee Outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics. 15(1)1-15.
Li-Chen Lim1, Choon-Jin Teh, Chan-Yin-Fah Benjamin)2016). A Preliminary Study of the Effects of Personality Traits on Workplace Deviance in the Voluntary Sector. Journal International Review of Management and Marketing, , 6(S7) 6-10.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G.. (2007). The sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lu J, Szegedi K, Qu J, Zhang G, Jia J, Liu X. (2023) Editorial: Understanding the deviant behavior in workplace: formation mechanism, impacts, and consequences. Front Psychol. 7(14),1252105
Malik, P. and Lenka, U. (2019), "Exploring interventions to curb workplace deviance: lessons from Air India", Tourism Review, Vol. 74 No. 3, pp. 563-585.
Narayanan, K., & Murphy, S. E. (2017). Conceptual Framework on Workplace Deviance Behaviour: A Review. Journal of Human Values, 23(2), 218-233.
Nasir, M., & Bashir, A. (2012). Examining workplace deviance in public sector organizations of Pakistan. International Journal of Social Economics, 39(4), 240-253.
Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. E., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual and organizational level consequences of organizational citizenship behavior: A meta- analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 122-141.
Prasso, S. (2007). Lessons for the Indian market. Chief Executive, 233, 46-53.
Rao. S . Perry. C (2003), Convergent interviewing to build a theory inunder-researched areas: principles and anexample investigation of Internet usage ininter-firm relationships, Qualitative Marke Research: An International Journal, Volume6Number4  pp. 236-247
Robinson Sandra ,Bennett Rebecca (1995). "A Typology of Deviant  Workplace Behaviors: a Multidimensional Scaling Study", Academy of Management Journal. 38/2: 555-572.
Robinson, S.L. & R.J.Bennett(1995). A Typology of Deviant Workplace Behaviors: A Multidimensional Scaling Study, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.(38):55-72.
Shosha, G. A. (2012). Employment of Colaizzi's strategy in descriptive
phenomenology a reflection of a researcher. European Scientific Journal,
8(27), 31-43.
Silva, H. M. S., &Ranasinghe, R. M. I. D. (2017). The Impact of Job Stress on Deviant Workplace Behaviour: A Study of Operational Level Employees of Comfort Apparel Solutions Company in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 7(1), 74-85.
Pletzer, J. L., Oostrom, J., & Voelpel, S. C. (2023). Age and workplace deviance: A meta-analytic test and a trait-based examination of why older employees engage in less workplace deviance. Work, Aging and Retirement, 9(2), 153-168.
Taylor, O. A. (2012). The relationship between culture and counterproductive workplace behaviors: A meta-analysis. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, the School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies, the University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. Pp. 242.
Tian, X.; Guo, Y.(2023). The Effect of Deviant Workplace Behavior on Job Performance: The Mediating Role of Organizational Shame and Moderating Role of Perceived Organizational Support . Behav. Sci, 13, 561. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/bs13070561.
Tufford, L., & Newman, P. (2012). Bracketing in Qualitative Research. Qualitative
Social Work, 11(1), 80-86.
Turel, Ofir(2017). Organizational deviance via social networking site use: The roles of inhibition, stress and sex differences. Personality and Individual Differences 119 . 311–316.
Uwannah Ngozi Caroline(2015). Absenteeism, Favouritism, and Tardiness asPredictors of Job Deviance in Academia: TheNigeria Experience. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. Vol. 1, No. 2, 2015, pp. 75-81.
Yao, Y. H., Wang, R. T., & Wang, K. Y. (2009). The influence of emotional intelligence on job performance: Moderating effects of leadership. In Management Science and Engineering, 2009. ICMSE 2009. International Conference on, 1155-1160.