نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای مدیریت آموزشی، گروه علوم تربیتی،دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران،

2 استاد گروه علوم تربیتی،دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

10.22034/jam.2025.143900.1111

چکیده

پژوهش با هدف طراحی و اعتباریابی پرسشنامه ویژگی‌های اعضای هیئت‌ علمی مرزگستر انجام شد. پژوهش ترکیبی و از نوع اکتشافی متوالی (کیفی- کمی) بود. بنابراین دو بخش طراحی و اجرا شد. 1- برای شناسایی ویژگی‌های اعضای هیئت علمی مرزگستر و ابعاد آن و ساخت ابزاراز رویکرد کیفی و روش پدیدارشناسی استفاده شد. جامعه پژوهش اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه‌های دولتی شهر تهران بود که تعداد 15 نفر به روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش این بخش مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته بود. 2- در بخش دوم، پژوهش از نوع توصیفی- تحلیلی بود. جامعه آماری شامل اعضای هیئت علمی دانشکده‌های فنی دانشگاه‌های دولتی شهر تهران به تعداد 2189 نفر بود که با استفاده از فرمول کوکران حجم نمونه به تعداد 327 نفر تعیین و نمونه‌گیری به روش تصادفی طبقه‌ای- نسبی انجام شد. تحلیل داده‌ها با روش‌های تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی، تحلیل عاملی تأییدی مرتبه دوم و ضریب آلفای کرونباخ انجام شد. یافته‌های بخش کیفی نشان داد؛ اعضای هیئت علمی مرزگستر دارای سه دسته ویژگی‌های فردی، شغلی و سازمانی می‌باشند. همچنین یافته‌ها نشان داد مقیاس 19 گویه‌ای ساخته شده از نظر روایی محتوایی، روایی سازه و پایایی از مطلوبیت بالایی برخوردار است، برا ین اساس پرسشنامه ویژگی‌های اعضای هیئت علمی مرزگستر قابلیت سنجش ویژگی‌های مرزگستری اعضای هیئت علمی در مطالعات پژوهشی را دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

Adams, K. R. (2014). The Exploration of Community Boundary Spanners in University–Community Partnerships. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 18, 3, 113-118.
Anderson, G., Gray-Nicolas, N., & Payton, M. (2021). Education faculty as knowledge brokers: Competing for access to New York State print media and policy influence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 29(12).
Bednarek, A. T., Wyborn, C., Cvitanovic, C., Meyer, R., Colvin, R. M., Addison. P.F.E., Close, S. L., Curran, K, Farooque, M., Goldman, E., Hart, D., Mannix, H., McGreavy, B., Parris, A., Posner, S., Robinson, C., Ryan, M., & Leith, P. (2018). Boundary spanning at the science-policy interface: the practitioners' perspectives. Sustain Sci. 13(4):1175-1183.
Bullinger, A. C., Neyer, A. K., Rass, M., & Moeslein, K. M. (2010). Community-based innovation contests: Where competition meets cooperation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 290-303.
Christopherson, E. G., Howell, E. L., Scheufele, D. A., Viswanath, K., & West, N. P. (2021). How science philanthropy can build equity. Stanford Social Innovation Review. 19 (4): 48–55. doi:10.48558/P4G8-QM77.
Compagnucci, L., & Spigarelli, F. (2020). The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, 161.
Cross, R., & Parker, A. (2004). The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations. Harvard Business School Press. Boston, Massachusetts.
Dekkers, M. (2019). Frontline Boundary Spanners: How Frontline Boundary Spanners Creat Common Ground Between Citizens, Social Service, Policy Makers and Other Relevant Stakeholders in Complex Social Policy Settings. Master Thesis, Research master Public Administration and Organizational Science, Utrecht University.
Delozier, J. L. (2018). Boundary Spanners and Trust Development Between Stakeholders in Integrated Water Resource Management: A Mixed Methods Study. Dissertations & Theses in Natural Resources. 266.
Dolmans, S.A.M., Walrave, B., Read, S., & van Stijn, N. (2022). Knowledge transfer to industry: how academic researchers learn to become boundary spanners during academic engagement. J Technol Transf, 47, 1422–1450.
Gwet, K. L (2014). Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters. USA: Advanced Analytics LLC.
Jonassen, M. W. (2020). Intersectoral collaboration at the municipality level: a qualitative study of the experiences of public health coordinators in Norway. Masters in Public Health Sciences. Faculty of Health- and Social Sciences, Inland Norway University.
Liu, X., Yu, Y., Zhao, X., & Zhang, N. (2022). Top management team boundary-spanning leadership: Measurement development and its impact on innovative behavior. Front. Psychol. 13:988771.
Nair, U. K., & Tandon, A. (2015). Boundary Objects and End User Engagement: Illustrations from the Social Enterprise Domain. S. Sahadev et al. (eds.), Boundary Spanning Elements and the Marketing Function in Organizations, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-13440-6_9
Oonk, C., Gulikers, J.T.M., den Brok, P.J., Wesselink, R., Beers, P., & Mulder, M. (2020). Teachers as brokers: adding a university-society perspective to higher education teacher competence profiles. High Educ, 80, 701–718.
Purcell, J., Pearl, A., & Van Schyndel, T. (2020). Boundary spanning leadership among community-engaged faculty: An exploratory study of faculty participating in higher education community engagement. Engaged Scholar Journal, 6(2), 1–30.
Purcell, W. M., Henriksen, H., & Spengler, J. D. (2019). Universities as the engine of transformational sustainability toward delivering the sustainable development goals: “Living labs” for sustainability, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20, 8, 1343-1357.
Rubens, A., Spigarelli, F., Cavicchi, A., & Rinaldi, C. (2017). Universities third mission and the entrepreneurial university and the challenges they bring to higher education institutions. J. Enterp. Communities, 11, 354-372.
Sandmann,L. R., Jordan, J. W., Mull, C. D., & Valentine, T. (2014). Measuring Boundary-Spanning Behaviors in Community Engagement. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 18, 3, 83-104.
Satheesh, Sh. A., van Meerker, I., Verweij, S., Bussher, T., & Arts, J. (2023). Enabling boundary spanners in public–private collaboration: The impact of support and role autonomy on reducing role stress. Wiley; Public Administration, 1-20.https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12927
Schotter, A.P., Mudambi, R., Doz, Y.L. and Gaur, A. (2017), Boundary-spanning in global organizations, Journal of Management Studies, 54, 4, 403-421.
Trencher, G., Yarime, M., McCormick, K., Doll, C., & Kraines, S. (2014). Beyond the third mission: Exploring the emerging university function of co-creation for sustainability, Science and Public Policy, 41, 2, 151-179.
Van Meerkerk, I. (2014). Boundary Spanning in Governance Networks: A study about the role of boundary spanners and their effects on democratic throughput legitimacy and performance of governance networks. Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Weerts, D. J., & Sandmann, L. R. (2008). Building a two-way street: Challenges and opportunities for community engagement at research universities. Review of Higher Education, 32(1), 73–106.
Weerts, D. J., & Sandmann, L. R. (2010). Community engagement and boundary-spanning roles at research universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(6), 702–727.
Wegemer, C. M., & Renick, J. (2021). Boundary Spanning Roles and Power in Educational Partnerships. AERA Open, 7.
Whitmer, A., Ogden, L., Lawton, J., Sturner, P., Groffman, P. M., Schneider, L., Hart, D., Halpern, B., Schlesinger, W., Raciti, S., Bettez, N., Ortega, S., Rustad, L., Pickett, S., & Killilea, M. (2010). The engaged university: Providing a platform for research that transforms society. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8(6), 314–321.
Williams P. (2012). Collaboration in public policy and practice: Perspectives on boundary spanners. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Williams, P. (2002). The Competent Boundary Spanner.” Public Administration. (80:1). 103-124. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9299.00296.
Williams, P. (2010). Special Agents: The Nature and Role of Boundary Spanners. (Presentation ESRC research seminars series - Collaborative Futures: New insights from intra and inter-sectoral collaborations). University of Birmingham. Retrieved from https://docplayer.net/43248650-Special-agents-the-nature-and-role-of-boundaryspanners.html
Yoon, Y. S. (2011). An Exploration of the Relationship between Boundary Spanning and Organizational Performance. A thesis submitted to the School of Technology Management and the Graduate School of UNIST in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Technology Management